Why Not?
Adventures of a geek who tends to think big.
-
2012-04-09
-
→
Why You Should Be Excited About Garbage Collection in Ruby 2.0 - Pat Shaughnessy
Awesome (and easy to read) writeup of how Ruby 2.0’s garbage collection will take advantage of the copy-on-write method to save memory.
-
2012-04-07
Time to be Classy
Step 1: Open the following three links in separate tabs:
- http://www.rainymood.com/
- http://endlessvideo.com/watch?v=HMnrl0tmd3k
- http://www.freesound.org/people/reinsamba/sounds/18766/
Step 2: Enjoy
-
2012-03-30
-
2012-03-22
In Depth Analysis of Bioware's PR Strategy w/r/t the Mass Effect 3 Ending Fallout
To give some context, the player base of Mass Effect are extremely mad at the ending of the trilogy. This is due to the promises made waaay back in 2006-2007 that choices you make in Mass Effect 1 may affect the ending you receive at the end of the trilogy years later.
Well, years later arrived and it turns out that almost none of the choices you made along the path of the game affected the ending you received (WARNING: Spoilers).
As such, Bioware is dealing with nothing less than a shit storm of PR fallout. If you are interested in the strategy they are taking and want an inside man’s look at what they doing to address the fan base, I highly recommend checking the link above.
My take on this? None of it surprises me; I haven’t been that impressed with any of the Bioware games since Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (KOTOR). Most of their games have just felt like copies of the format KOTOR introduced and none have had the same magic that the Baldur’s Gate games had. Sure, Mass Effect is nothing like KOTOR, but beyond its dialog system, there is nothing special about it at all. The story is fairly bland, unsurprising, and the fighting system has nothing special about it at all.
I think this ending fiasco just officially made me never want to buy anything from Bioware again - I’m tired of being bored with their games.
-
2012-03-16
IBM Pulse 2012: Tivoli gets the bleeding edge of tech
I attended my first IBM Pulse conference last week to help showcase the work my team and I have been doing since I left school last June. I know I’ve been fairly quiet on this blog about my current work, but the gist of it is that I’ve been part of the team that is making sure that IBM and Tivoli delivers on the idea of “DevOps” (or its other name, “continuous delivery”).
I had the pleasure of meeting Donnie (who wrote the above post and is a great guy to talk with) and I am wonderfully pleased to see that we succeeded on getting the message of DevOps delivered correctly. It’s been a great ride so far, but we still have a lot of work to do to make sure we deliver the capabilities we have been talking about.
If you are interested to hear more about what exactly I’ve been up to these past months, I recommend checking out this interview of Bill Higgins and Dan Berg from Pulse.
-
→
Back to the Future Meets Metal - 331Erock
Source: thefrogman
-
2012-02-27
Using OVF Images in VMWare Fusion
For an upcoming demo, I had to set up a couple of virtual images on my machine to act as app servers. The problem I had to deal with was how do I import them into VMWare Fusion 4 when they were made with ESX4 and Workstation 7?
Well it turned out that I needed to convert the virtual image from OVF format into VMX since Fusion does not read OVF (afaik).
To convert the image from OVF to VMX, you need to use VMWare’s ovftool:
- Download and Install the ofvtool
- Open a Terminal
- Create a directory where you want the VMX image to live:
mkdir /path/to/vmx- Go to the directory where the ovftool lives:
cd /Applications/VMware\ OVF\ Tool/- Run the ovftool on your ovf file:
./ovftool /path/to/file.ovf /path/to/vmx/file.vmxThe tool will then convert the file and copy the vmdk binary to the directory where your new VMX file will live. Once done, you can then use VMWare fusion to open your new VMX file and run the vm.
-
→